Firefox arrived with a bang, will it die with a whimper?

Showing all posts tagged: technology

Firefox arrived with a bang, will it die with a whimper?

20 June 2025

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, writing for The Register:

As for Firefox itself, users are reporting a growing number of technical problems that have eroded the browser’s reputation for reliability. In particular, even longtime users are reporting that more and more mainstream websites, such as Instagram, Salesforce, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp Web, either fail to load or function poorly in recent Firefox releases. In particular, Firefox seems to be having more trouble than ever rendering JavaScript-heavy sites. Like it or not, many popular sites live and die with JavaScript these days.

According to Statcounter, Firefox’s market share peaked at almost thirty-two percent in December 2009. Statcounter’s numbers only go back to the beginning of 2009, so perhaps uptake of the Mozilla made browser was even higher earlier on. I migrated to Firefox the minute it launched in late 2004, at a time when Microsoft’s Internet Explorer (IE) all but had the browser market cornered.

People desperately wanted an alternative to IE, and Firefox delivered. Despite the experiences of others today, I’m not presently having many problems. WhatsApp, LinkedIn, and Salesforce are not websites I visit. I do use the web version of Instagram (IG), where I have occasional problems logging in. Sometimes I’m greeted by a blank white screen after entering my credentials, but this is usually resolved by reloading IG and trying again. Up until now, I’d attributed this difficulty to IG.

At the moment Firefox is the only browser I’m using on my Linux Mint setup, as the Flatpaks for Opera and Chrome remain unverified (I’m aware I can still install and use the browsers nonetheless). For whatever reason I was running Firefox, Opera, and Chrome simultaneously on my old Windows 10 setup. Little point my explaining why, suffice to say each browser served different purposes.

Firefox’s market share today, again, according to Statcounter, hovers at around the two to three percent mark. It’s a sorry state of affairs for a once popular browser, and I can only wonder if Mozilla will attempt to turns things around.

RELATED CONTENT

browsers, history, technology, trends

The infinite workday: more work hours and less employee privacy

19 June 2025

Microsoft is calling it the infinite workday.

Based on telemetry data, gleaned from apps including Microsoft 365, the American tech company has found the workday has been gradually becoming longer, and work-related activities are increasingly seeping into the weekend. This for people supposedly working Monday to Friday, between nine o’clock in the morning, until five o’clock in the afternoon.

According to some of Microsoft’s findings, workers are reading emails as early as six in the morning during the week. The same workers may still be on deck well into the evening, attending online meetings, called to cater for colleagues spread across multiple timezones. In addition, workers are more frequently checking email messages during the weekend.

So much for work-life balance, which I’ve always seen as a theoretical construct. Not for real. Bullshit. My workday looks tame by comparison. But the accumulation of the telemetry data used to compile Microsoft’s report is also concerning. Not only are people working longer hours, they are also being surveilled. Some degree — who knows how much precisely — of information about their use of various Microsoft software, is being gathered.

The case for adopting something like LibreOffice, an open source variation of Microsoft products such as Word and Excel, becomes all the stronger. This won’t rectify the problem of working extended hours and weekends, but at least workers won’t have large tech companies keeping tabs on them.

Nine minutes no more: iPhone users soon able to vary snooze alarm intervals

18 June 2025

It should be six-thirty in the morning, on the east coast of Australia, when this post is published, but all things being equal, I’ll be slumbering for another ninety-minutes.

And when the alarm on my iPhone starts chiming, I’ll likely press the snooze button a number of times. I’ll be productive though. Reading and replying to email, and looking at news headlines. Every nine minutes I’ll be reminded I need to start the day in the not too distant future.

But some people’s morning routines might be about to change, following the announcement at WWDC 2025 last week, that the upcoming iOS 26 update, will allow people to set snooze intervals from anywhere between one to fifteen minutes.

I’ve been thinking about the potential of being able to change the length of the snooze interval, but am not sure if it’s for me. Anything less would be too often, and anything longer might be a little too spread out. But I think being able to change the interval period, even if only to a maximum of fifteen minutes, will be welcomed by more than a few people.

RELATED CONTENT

smartphones, technology, trends

Linux, LibreOffice, offer an escape from Windows 11 and Microsoft

18 June 2025

KDE, developers of free and open source software, have launched a campaign encouraging Windows 10 (Win10) users to migrate to a Linux Operating System (this article is a good starting point), rather than moving to the Windows 11 (Win11) Operating System (OS).

Win11 stands to render many older, but still perfectly functional computers useless, after Microsoft recently changed the operating specifications for the OS. This means some older devices may no longer have sufficient capacity to operate Win11. The message from Microsoft seems clear: buy a new computer, or go without one all together. That could be a confronting choice for some people.

But as Sayan Sen, writing at Neowin, points out, there is another option, one that is also being backed by The Document Foundation, maker of LibreOffice, a suite of productivity applications similar to Word and Excel:

“You don’t have to follow Microsoft’s upgrade path. There is a better option that puts control back in the hands of users, institutions, and public bodies: Linux and LibreOffice. Together, these two programmes offer a powerful, privacy-friendly and future-proof alternative to the Windows + Microsoft 365 ecosystem.”

The Document Foundation also suggests Win11 is not quite as cost-free as is believed:

“The move to Windows 11 isn’t just about security updates. It increases dependence on Microsoft through aggressive cloud integration, forcing users to adopt Microsoft accounts and services. It also leads to higher costs due to subscription and licensing models, and reduces control over how your computer works and how your data is managed. Furthermore, new hardware requirements will render millions of perfectly good PCs obsolete.

They leave the best for last:

The end of Windows 10 does not mark the end of choice, but the beginning of a new era. If you are tired of mandatory updates, invasive changes, and being bound by the commercial choices of a single supplier, it is time for a change. Linux and LibreOffice are ready — 2025 is the right year to choose digital freedom!”

Regular readers of disassociated will know I migrated to Linux Mint about a year ago, and have been using Writer and Calc, the LibreOffice versions of Word and Excel, since. I won’t sugarcoat it: the move had its bumps, and I needed to make several tweaks to my laptop before the system stability I’d enjoyed on Win10 returned.

I also needed to start using some new apps, and had to give up on one or two I couldn’t find Linux compatible versions of (despite trying to use various Windows emulators), but was able to figure out workarounds. Today, I barely notice the difference. I open my laptop every morning and get working pretty much as usual.

If you’re having a problem getting started on — as it was in my case — Linux Mint, the Linux Mint Forums were a great help in the migration process. Chances are someone’s already run into whatever problem you’re having, and found a solution, which you can try. Otherwise, you can post a question asking for help.

Joanna Stern, Nilay Patel, light up the Talk Show WWDC 2025 edition

16 June 2025

Joanna Stern, technology writer at The Wall Street Journal, and Nilay Patel, editor-in-chief of The Verge, were this year’s guests on the live edition of John Gruber’s Talk Show podcast at WWDC last week. It’s the first time in ten years senior Apple executives have not appeared on the WWDC edition of the show, having “declined” to participate this year.

Some speculated their absence was on account of an article Gruber wrote in March, critical of Apple’s delays in rolling out enhancements to Siri, the iPhone’s digital assistant, and Apple Intelligence, an array of AI features the company suggested — at WWDC 2024 — were close to release.

Gruber addressed the nonattendance of Apple executives, typically Craig Federighi (SVP of software engineering), and Greg Joswiak (SVP of worldwide marketing), saying there had been some degree of discussion between him and the company on the matter, but didn’t go into detail.

Some people, including Stern, believe their non-participation is temporary. Others, however, see things differently, with one pointing to a preview screening, at WWDC, of Brad Pitt’s high profile new movie, F1, co-produced by Apple Studios, which was scheduled to coincide with the Talk Show.

I’m not sure Apple’s no show was entirely a bad thing though, and the presence of new faces, and perspectives, was refreshing. While it’s WWDC, and attendees want to hear senior Apple executives speak informally, the format can be a little predictable. All the way down to Joswiak sitting vigilantly on stage throughout, making sure no one speaks out of turn, though this is also somewhat amusing.

Gruber is sometimes chastised for being soft on the Apple people, and shying away from asking hard questions. But I doubt a “tough” approach would be productive. Apple will only ever the answer the questions they want to. Gleaning insights by way the fireside chat format is probably going to be more informative. That said, Stern put Federighi and Joswiak through the wringer, in an interview she recorded with the pair, prior to her appearance on the Talk Show.

Canva catches the AI coding assistant vibe

13 June 2025

Simon Newton writing on the Canva Engineering Blog:

Yet until recently, our interview process asked candidates to solve coding problems without the very tools they’d use on the job. Our interview approach included a Computer Science Fundamentals interview which focused on algorithms and data structures. This interview format pre-dated the rise of AI tools, and candidates were asked to write the code themselves. This dismissal of AI tools during the interview process meant we weren’t truly evaluating how candidates would perform in their actual role.

The Australian founded online graphic design platform is now mandating candidates for coding roles be proficient with AI tools, and will be expected to demonstrate as much during coding interviews. Given many Canva employees (to say nothing of the industry as a whole) are using AI assistants in their coding work, the move is hardly surprising.

Canva is an app I’ve to tried to pickup, but to date with little success. Several years ago I went along to the Canva offices in Sydney — I’m pretty sure they were located in the suburb of Surry Hills at that point — to give the then iteration of the app a try.

With again, er, limited success. I was kindly told long-term users of Photoshop tend to struggle more than others with Canva, so that was some consolation.

Proficiency with Canva is still on my to-do list, but at the moment getting my head around GIMP is the priority. I’ve not been able to sandbox Photoshop on Linux Mint, so when it comes to image creation and manipulation, GIMP it is.

Still talking of Canva, I learned in quickly looking up the company, that Cameron Adams is a co-founder. Yes: have I been living under a rock or what?

Adams might be better known to some earlier (I’m talking prior to 2010) web creative people as the Man in Blue, being his website/blog, which is still online. In 2011, Adams created a data visualisation of the music of Daft Punk, which is likewise still online, and something I linked to back in the day.

There’s some oldies, but goodies, in the mix, including Da Funk, Television Rules the Nation, Alive, Face to Face, and One More Time. And how good is the pre-loading popup, this using Firefox 139:

If you are going to view this site in Firefox, it is recommended that you use the latest version (Firefox 4).

That’s quite the trip back in time. Firefox 4 came out in March 2011. A good year before Canva was founded, and what seems like a lifetime before AI as we know it emerged in spectacular fashion.

LibreOffice replaces Microsoft 365 at Denmark’s Ministry of Digitisation

12 June 2025

The ministry will swap the likes of Microsoft Word and Excel for LibreOffice applications instead, says Caroline Stage, Denmark’s Digitisation Minister. It is anticipated all Ministry staff will be using LibreOffice by the end of the year.

The switch to open source software is part of a move by the Danish Government to reduce their dependency on applications made in the United States. Comments by US President Donald Trump, expressing interest in buying Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, have also concerned and angered the Danish Government.

I’ve been using LibreOffice word processor and spreadsheet apps since migrating to Linux Mint last year. I’m hardly a power user of either, maybe tapping into, what, ten percent of the available functionality of each app, but they do exactly what Word and Excel did before. As I type the draft of this post in Writer, the LibreOffice word processor, I can barely discern any difference.

I dare say my computer is better off for the change though, by way of the absence of all manner of needless extraneous bits and pieces that come with non open source software.

RELATED CONTENT

current affairs, technology, trends

Claude fails to explain the abrupt disappearance of their blog

10 June 2025

AI assistant Claude must have had one of the shortest blogging stints ever seen in the blogosphere. Just days after announcing Claude’s debut as a blogger — albeit with “human oversight” — Anthropic, Claude’s creator, almost immediately shuttered the publication. The URL for the blog presently redirects to Anthropic’s main website.

We can only speculate as to why the plug was pulled on the venture, but I was looking forward to reading some of Claude’s output. This preferably with a minimum of human oversight, as I was curious to see how well an AI assistant could write by themselves. Anthropic’s move could possibly be seen to suggest they weren’t too confident in Claude’s blogging abilities though.

It’s good news for human self-publishers: we live to blog for another day. Or two.

On not using AI assistants or LLM tools to draft or write your blog posts

7 June 2025

Dave Phillips, an Australian blogging contemporary, writing at Cafe Dave:

Is there still value in writing blog posts from scratch, rather than using a LLM tool to help with a first draft? I hope so. Even if it’s slower, there is some change being wrought in the mind of the person doing the writing that remains undone when using a LLM.

There is some change being wrought in the mind of the person doing the writing.

I’m trying to make use of AI assistants to help me in my day-to-day work — I have three jobs if I include writing at disassociated — but struggle a bit. I speak only for myself, but as someone who writes, using AI to any degree, no matter how insignificant, feels wrong.

It’d be really good if AI could, say, run the house, freeing up time to write here and elsewhere. Because Dave is on point here: having something else do your writing, from first draft through to completion, takes something away from the writer. This is the reason we’re writing in the first place.

Devious AI assistants becoming more human all the time

7 June 2025

Mark Sullivan, writing for Fast Company:

Separately, the independent research firm Apollo Research observed an instance of Claude Opus 4 “writing self-propagating worms, fabricating legal documentation, and leaving hidden notes to future instances of itself” with the goal of sullying its developers’ intentions. Anthropic says that it corrected these early safety issues in later versions of the model.

An AI assistant capable of this degree of adroitness, before being “corrected” that is, could probably solve some tricky problems, and no doubt does anyway.

Riddle me this: do you think AI assistants can be trained to make use of negative attributes, such as being devious, to achieve only positive outcomes?

RELATED CONTENT

artificial intelligence, technology

« older posts